Pustaka Prompt
Law & Compliance
Ready prompts per unit. Fill in the blanks, check the preview, copy it into the AI tool you are allowed to use at work.
28 prompts
Candidate rule map
Use it when: A new legal question has come up and you need an initial map of possibly relevant rules to check one by one in official sources.
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need an initial map of rules that might be relevant to the question ‹pertanyaan›. This is a search map, not an answer. Reader: me, and I will look up every candidate in an official source. Material: facts and dates: ‹fakta-tanggal›. Limits: do not quote article wording and do not give article numbers. Name only the regulation, its type and topic. Shape: a candidate list: the main law, possible amendments, implementing regulations, types of decisions to look for. Check: give every candidate the status "unchecked" and flag candidates whose version may have changed around the date of the facts.
Article elements from pasted text
Use it when: You have copied a provision's text from an official source and want its elements broken down to discuss with the advocate.
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need a list of the elements of the provision I paste. Reader: an advocate on my team. Material: provision text, version ‹versi›: ‹teks-pasal› Limits: use only this text. Do not add elements from interpretation or memory. Do not conclude whether any fact meets an element. Shape: a table with columns element, original quoted sentence, note on terms that need defining. Check: flag exceptions, extra conditions or references to other articles I did not paste.
Compare two versions of a rule
Use it when: A rule has been amended and you need to see what changed, while the advocate decides which version applies.
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need to see what changed between two versions of a provision, for facts that happened on ‹tanggal-fakta›. Reader: the advocate who will decide which version applies. Material: old version: ‹versi-lama› new version: ‹versi-baru› Limits: do not decide which version applies. Use only these two texts. Shape: a three-column table: part, old wording, new wording, with a separate row for every change. Check: flag changes that touch elements, penalties, deadlines or conditions; also flag parts where only the number changed.
Judgment summary
Use it when: You need a summary of a court judgment for a particular reader, as reading material, not a legal opinion.
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need a judgment summary for ‹pembaca›. I am not asking for a legal opinion. Reader: ‹pembaca›. Material: a copy of the judgment from the official directory: ‹putusan› Limits: use only the judgment text. Separate the parties' arguments from the judges' reasoning. Name parties by role. Shape: five parts: the parties, the dispute, main reasoning with quotes and pages, the ruling, unclear points. Check: flag if the ruling does not fully match the claims, and flag reasoning whose page you could not find.
Match facts to elements
Use it when: You have the facts of a matter and the elements of a provision and want them mapped as material for a talk with the advocate.
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need a map between the facts of a matter and the elements of a provision, as material for a discussion with the advocate. Reader: the responsible advocate. Material: elements and provision text: ‹teks-pasal› masked facts: ‹fakta› Limits: do not conclude whether an element is met. Do not add facts. Shape: a table: element, possibly related facts, evidence document mentioning them, missing facts. Check: flag elements with no facts at all.