Module 1 · Start safe
Fair to every student
In short
Models repeat stereotypes from the text they learned from. Check AI-made examples, names, images and questions against protected traits, and write fairness limits into every request.
After this lesson you can
- Recognise protected traits and their stand-ins in AI-made material, questions and feedback
- Check AI-made material for stereotypes before using it in class
- Write fairness limits into requests for material and questions
Terms in this lesson
Understand
Lesson material shapes how students see themselves. Word problems that always show fathers at work and mothers in the kitchen, scientist examples who all come from one region, or images showing only one skin colour all teach something beyond the subject. Students who never see themselves in the examples conclude that the subject is not for them.
AI adds to this risk in two ways. First, model bias: models learn from huge amounts of human text, including its prejudices, so unasked they tend to give the names, jobs and roles most common in their training data. Ask for ten word problems and the doctor is likely a man, the nurse a woman, and every character lives in a big city. Second, speed: a teacher who writes five questions may notice the pattern; a teacher who receives fifty at once from a machine rarely reads them all closely.
What is often missed are stand-ins, details that do not name a protected trait but carry it. A question about holidays abroad or expensive gadgets assumes every student is well off. A question using regional terms makes it harder for students from elsewhere, when what is measured is maths. Feedback that judges accent or handwriting judges what was not taught.
Fairness applies to language too. Students with visual impairments or dyslexia need material that assistive tools can read, short sentences and clear fonts. AI can help simplify language, but you make sure the content does not shrink for that student.
Checking is not complicated. Read the AI output with three questions. Who appears in the examples, and who never does? Is any question easier for students from a particular background, when that is unrelated to the learning goal? Does any sentence judge students on something from the protected traits list? If unsure, ask a colleague from a different background to read the first ten questions.
AI-made pictures and illustrations need the same care. Ask for a picture of a teacher, scientist or athlete, and an image model tends to produce the faces, clothes and bodies it has seen most. If you use illustrations on worksheets or slides, look at the whole set together, not one by one. Ask whether students with a headscarf, a wheelchair or a different skin colour ever appear, and whether any character is drawn as funny or foolish because of a physical trait.
Watch example names too. Names hint at religion, ethnicity and origin. Models often use names from one region only, or give certain names to the character who makes the mistake. Replace names with roles or use a mix from many regions, and never use names of students in your class as characters, even meaning it warmly. A student whose name is used for the character who cannot count may be teased by classmates for days.
Finally, remember that fair does not mean every student gets exactly the same material. Students learning Indonesian as a second language, or who need large print, may get an adapted version, as long as the learning goal is the same and they are assessed on the same criteria.
Before
The prompt
Write 5 ratio word problems for class 7.
What came back
Bad example output, do not use: (1) Mr Budi, an engineer, buys a new car... (2) Mother bakes cakes for a social gathering... (3) Andi goes on holiday abroad with his family... Every male character works, every female character is at home, and two problems assume a well-off family.
After
The prompt
Goal: I need 5 ratio word problems for class 7 that every student can work on. Reader: class 7 students from diverse backgrounds. Material: direct and inverse proportion. Limits: varied characters and jobs without a male-female role pattern; everyday contexts students in villages and cities know; no expensive goods; no mention of religion, ethnicity or appearance. Shape: questions, then answers and solution steps. Check: at the end, list each character's role so I can check the variety.
What came back
Draft, answers not yet checked by the teacher: (1) A farmer and her child plant seedlings... (2) Ms Sari, a mechanic, changes the oil... (3) The school volleyball team shares water bottles... Character roles: female farmer, female mechanic, mixed team, male vegetable seller, male nurse.
What changed
- The first request sets no limits, so the model uses the most common patterns from its training data.
- The second request writes fairness limits clearly and asks for a list of roles to check.
- The answers must still be recalculated by the teacher; models can miscalculate.
Common mistake
- Mistake
- Assuming AI-made material is neutral because a machine made it.
- Why it hurts
- Machines learn from human writing and repeat its patterns at scale. A stereotype that slips into fifty questions is read by a whole year group.
- Do this instead
- Write fairness limits into the request, ask for a list of character roles, and read the output with the three check questions before use.
Try
Sorting card
Which measures the learning goal, and which carries a protected trait or its stand-in?
A question reading a rainfall chart
A question on the cost of family holiday flights
A rubric assessing evidence and reasoning
Example leaders who are all men
A question on the area of a vegetable garden
Feedback on handwriting neatness in a science task
6 cards left
You want word problems to feel familiar, so you plan to use names of students in your class as characters. What is the best choice?
Check material for fairness
Works with any AI assistant.
Your prompt
Goal: I need a fairness check of the material below before using it in class ‹jenjang›. Reader: myself. Material: ‹materi› Limits: do not rewrite the material; only flag. Check age, sex, religion, ethnicity or race, marital status, pregnancy, disability, place of residence or origin, photo or appearance, health conditions and economic situation. Shape: a table of sentence, possible issue, suggested replacement. Check: also write who never appears in the examples.
Take home
Fairness check
- My request writes fairness limits clearly
- I read who appears and who never appears in the examples
- No question is easier for a particular background without a learning reason
- Feedback does not judge anything on the protected traits list
- Material can be read by students using assistive tools
What went wrong for us
Reviewers read both languages
- Context
- Our course is written in Indonesian with an English version alongside.
- What tends to go wrong
- Reviewers read lessons in both languages, not just one, and an automatic checker makes sure every text has a counterpart in the other language.
- What it costs if ignored
- Readers in both languages get the same content and the same safety limits.
- Root cause
- A translation checked only at a glance often loses a warning or changes the meaning of an important sentence.
- How we do it
- Every lesson is read in two languages, and content differences are fixed on both sides.
- The rule we keep
- The content checker rejects text that exists in only one language and templates whose fill-in fields differ between the two languages.
The lessonEvery reader deserves the same content and warnings.
What it means for your workIf you use AI to translate material or letters, read both versions before sending.
