Module 6 · Produce real work
From request to finished document
In short
Good documents are built in stages: outline, section by section, then edit. An AI draft is material, not the final product. Before sending, check every reference, and keep the old version so you can go back.
After this lesson you can
- Break a long document into outline, sections, then editing
- Check every attachment, table and link referred to before sending
- Prepare a way back before replacing an old result
Terms in this lesson
Understand
Asking AI to "make a 10-page proposal" in a single request almost always produces a document that looks complete but is shallow: neat headings, generic content and figures of unclear origin. Long documents are better built in four stages, and you hold the wheel at each one.
- Outline. Ask for a list of sections with one sentence of content each. Write the request with our checklist (Goal, Reader, Material, Limits, Shape, Check; see the request checklist lesson). This is where a wrong direction is cheapest to fix: strike or move one line.
- Section by section. Write one section per request, with the material for that section. The model works more carefully on a clear piece than on ten pages at once.
- Editing. Read it whole, as the reader. Remove repetition between sections, align terms and cut sentences that say nothing.
- Check before sending. Names, dates, figures and references are checked one by one.
An AI draft is material, not the final product. Your name is on the document, not the model's. The parts that go wrong most often are always the same: names of people and institutions, dates, figures, and references to rules or other documents. Figures have their own lesson (checking figures and measuring results); claims and references are checked as in the lesson on checking output.
Two small habits prevent big problems.
Check everything referred to. Documents often mention things outside themselves: "attached", "see Table 3", "fill in the form at the following link". AI will happily write "full schedule attached" when no schedule is attached, or cite "Table 3" that became number 4 after you moved a section. Before sending, search for every word like "attachment", "attached", "table", "figure", "link" and "see". Make sure each reference points to something that really exists, with the right number, and that the recipient can open it, not only you.
Prepare a way back. When a new AI-made version is about to replace an old document, such as an official letter template or an SOP, first save the old version with a clear name, for example with the date. Do not overwrite an approved file. If the new version turns out to drop an important clause or change an agreed tone, you can go back in one minute, not rebuild it from memory.
When writing section by section, each prompt should carry three things: the outline you approved (so the model knows where this section sits), the material for that section, and one sentence on what the previous section covered (so it is not repeated). Do not paste the whole document each time; an overfull context makes the model lose focus and start mixing sections. If a section needs figures, paste the figure table into that section's prompt only. Once all sections are done, put them together in your own document, not in the chat, and read it from the start. Reading the whole thing in the document often shows problems you cannot see when each section is read separately on the chat screen.
Before
The prompt
Write a complete 10-page occupational safety training proposal for the warehouse.
What came back
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY TRAINING PROPOSAL 1. Background: Workplace safety is the top priority of every modern company... 2. Objectives... ... 7. Budget: Rp 85,000,000 (breakdown attached) 8. Schedule: attached
After
The prompt
I need an outline for an occupational safety training proposal for the warehouse. No full text yet. Goal: the branch manager approves a two-day training for 30 warehouse staff. Reader: a busy branch manager; they read the summary and budget first. Material: minor accident records for the last three months (pasted below, names removed) and the maximum budget from my manager. Limits: do not invent budget figures or dates; write [TO FILL IN] if not in the material. Shape: a list of sections, one sentence per section, and for each section the material I still need. Check: mark every place that will refer to an attachment.
What came back
1. Summary for the manager: proposal, total cost, main benefit. Needed: final budget figure. 2. Problem: 11 minor accidents in three months, most while moving goods. Needed: nothing, from the material. 3. Proposed training: two days, 30 participants. Needed: name of the provider. 4. Budget: [TO FILL IN]. Attachment reference: cost breakdown (ATTACHMENT, not yet available). 5. Schedule: [TO FILL IN]. Attachment reference: schedule (ATTACHMENT, not yet available). 6. Measure of success: number of accidents in the following three months.
What changed
- The first version invented a Rp 85 million budget and wrote "attached" for two attachments that do not exist.
- Stopping at the outline is deliberate: at this stage, changing direction is still cheap.
- The ATTACHMENT markers make a list of what you must prepare before sending.
Common mistake
- Mistake
- Sending an AI-written e-mail that says "attached" or "please fill in at the following link" without checking that the attachment and link exist and can be opened.
- Why it hurts
- Recipients look for a missing attachment, open a link only you can access, or fill in an old version of a form. You look careless, and in matters like registration or payment, people can miss a deadline because of a wrong reference.
- Do this instead
- Before pressing send, search for every reference word. Attach first, then send. Open each link from a signed-out window to make sure recipients can open it.
Try
Order the way to build a long document with AI. Read each stage, then think about what you check there.
Step 1 of 6
Save the old version
If this document replaces an old one, save the old one first with the date in its name.
Take home
Before an AI-made document leaves your desk
- Built in stages: outline, sections, edit
- Names, dates, figures and references checked one by one
- Every attachment, table and link exists and opens for the recipient
- The old version is saved, not overwritten
- I read it whole as the reader
What went wrong for us
Reminders that sent links that did not exist
- Context
- The system sends test reminders to candidates in a batch. Each reminder creates a new link and revokes the old one.
- What happened
- One failing email mid-batch rolled back the whole transaction, including the new links for reminders whose emails had already been sent.
- Impact
- Candidates received links that did not exist in the database. Found in review, before release.
- Root cause
- An email is an effect outside the database that cannot be undone, yet it was treated as part of the transaction.
- What we did
- The new link is committed before the email is sent, and the old link is revoked only after the send succeeds.
- The guard we keep now
- Every outside effect (email, message, payment) happens after the data it refers to is committed, and one failure never undoes what was already sent.
The lessonNever send something that refers to data not yet saved.
What it means for your workDo not send an e-mail that mentions an attachment, link or form that does not yet exist and open for the recipient.
